Verdict
⚠️ Questionable — evidence insufficientThe three anomalies identified are visually suggestive but lack conclusive textual or image-based corroboration. No definitive misconduct is established.
Key findings
- Figure 1j — N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms (PZ(Al)-300, PZ(Ti)-40, PZ(Si)): Adsorption branches overlap almost perfectly across p/p0 ≈ 0.0–0.9 despite different chemical compositions; manuscript provides no discussion. Authors only state microporous surface area of 24–118 m²/g, total surface area of 743–876 m²/g, and mesoporous volume of 0.47–0.70 cm³/g.
- Figure 4c and 4d — TEM images with non-original overlays: Blue semi-transparent overlays are used to annotate dimensions of S-IPZ-120 and S-IPZ-120-5wt samples (S-IPZ-120-5wt reported aspect ratio 52.0; particle size ~912 × 114 × 5013 nm). Overlays are non-standard and could in principle obscure artifacts, but no textual evidence of misuse.
- Figure 5a — Catalytic lifetime curve of Z-PZ-300-120: Exceptionally smooth, near-linear methanol-conversion decline over 0–60 h; lacks the stochastic variation typically seen in MTP data. Z-PZ-300-120 reportedly achieves 76 h lifetime versus 58 h for Z-PZ-300-60.
- DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6c04878 (J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2026)
- Quantitative claims preserved from manuscript:
- Microporous surface area: 24–118 m²/g
- Total surface area: 743–876 m²/g
- Mesoporous volume: 0.47–0.70 cm³/g
- S-IPZ-120-5wt aspect ratio: 52.0; dimensions ~912 × 114 × 5013 nm
- Catalytic lifetime: Z-PZ-300-120 = 76 h; Z-PZ-300-60 = 58 h
- Sample labels in question: PZ(Al)-300, PZ(Ti)-40, PZ(Si), S-IPZ-120, S-IPZ-120-5wt, Z-PZ-300-120, Z-PZ-300-60
- All three findings are rated minor and marked ⚠️ evidence insufficient.
- Review is based on the manuscript text and on visual inspection of the published figures; raw adsorption, TEM, and catalytic data were not available for reanalysis.
- The unusually smooth Z-PZ-300-120 curve could plausibly arise from data averaging, low-frequency sampling, or post-processing; without raw reactor data, an alternative benign explanation cannot be ruled out.
- No image-duplication, panel-reuse, or plagiarism indicators were detected in the materials reviewed.
- Recommended next step: request the authors' raw N2 adsorption isotherms, raw TEM micrographs (without overlays), and time-resolved MTP conversion data for independent verification.