English static mirror for SEO/GEO · AI-assisted translation · Read Chinese original

SliderQuant: Adaptive Layer-wise Quantization for Accurate LLM Compression

Forum topic · 小凯 · 2026-03-29

Summary

SliderQuant is an ICLR 2026 post-training quantization (PTQ) framework that replaces uniform quantization with a sliding-window strategy tailored to each layer's sensitivity. The authors observe that LLM shallow and deep layers—especially the first and last—are significantly more sensitive to quantization than middle layers, where aggressive low-bit quantization is well tolerated. To exploit this, SliderQuant assigns higher bit-widths or finer granularity near the input and output, applies aggressive quantization in the middle, and uses a progressive intra-layer schedule that lowers precision gradually. A small set of learnable sliding parameters—controlling window size, transition speed, and per-group adjustments—are optimized jointly with the task loss via backpropagation. Evaluated on Llama, Llama2, Llama3, Qwen2.5, DeepSeek-R1 distilled variants, and large MoE models across zero-shot reasoning, math, and code generation, SliderQuant consistently outperforms prior PTQ methods including rotation-based approaches, and remains strong under joint weight-activation quantization.

Overview

SliderQuant is a post-training quantization (PTQ) framework, accepted at ICLR 2026, that adapts its compression strategy layer by layer instead of using a single global configuration. The paper introduces a "sliding" mechanism that varies quantization aggressiveness across the network depth, plus learnable sliding parameters that are co-optimized with the model.

Key points

  • Layer sensitivity is non-uniform. Empirical analysis shows that the first and last transformer blocks suffer the largest quantization errors. Shallow layers act as the model's perceptual front-end and lack upstream buffering, while the final layer directly produces output logits with no downstream correction. Middle layers carry more redundancy and tolerate aggressive low-bit quantization.
  • Three sliding-window regimes. SliderQuant applies a conservative strategy at shallow layers (higher bit-width or finer-grained grouping), an aggressive strategy in the middle (lower bit-width, coarser granularity), and a refined strategy at deep layers to preserve output quality.
  • Progressive intra-layer quantization. Within each layer, precision is reduced gradually—starting from a higher baseline, stepping down toward the target bit-width, and ending with calibration—so the model adapts smoothly rather than absorbing a one-shot precision shock.
  • Learnable sliding parameters. Window size, transition smoothness, and per-group adjustments are parameterized and trained end-to-end alongside the task loss, allowing the model to discover its own layer-wise quantization schedule instead of relying on hand-tuned heuristics.
  • Mathematical formulation. For layer l, a sensitivity coefficient is computed as alpha_l = f(l; theta_slide) with a learnable theta_slide, and the per-layer bit-width becomes bit_width_l = base_bit_width + alpha_l * delta_bits. Standard quantization/dequantization uses per-layer scale s_l and zero-point z_l that are themselves learned.
  • Broad empirical coverage. Experiments span Llama, Llama2, Llama3, Qwen2.5, DeepSeek-R1 distilled variants, and large MoE architectures, evaluated on zero-shot common-sense reasoning, math, and code generation. SliderQuant outperforms prior PTQ baselines, including rotation-based methods, and remains robust under challenging weight-activation joint quantization.
  • Practical impact. Because PTQ avoids costly retraining, the approach makes it feasible to deploy 70B-scale models with substantially reduced memory and compute footprints while preserving accuracy, supporting LLM deployment on commodity hardware.

Outlook

The authors highlight dynamic input-dependent quantization, extension to multimodal architectures where different encoders have distinct sensitivity profiles, and hardware-aware sliding that navigates the accuracy-efficiency Pareto frontier on specific accelerators as promising future directions.

References

1. Wang, S., Li, C., Kang, Y., Fan, J., Ou, Z., & Yao, A. (2026). *SliderQuant: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for LLMs*. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25284 2. Frantar, E., et al. (2022). *GPTQ: Accurate post-training quantization for generative pre-trained transformers*. ICLR 2023. 3. Xiao, G., et al. (2023). *SmoothQuant: Accurate and efficient post-training quantization for large language models*. ICML 2023. 4. Dettmers, T., et al. (2022). *LLM.int8(): 8-bit matrix multiplication for transformers at scale*. NeurIPS 2022. 5. Lin, J., et al. (2023). *AWQ: Activation-aware weight quantization for LLM compression and acceleration*. MLSys 2024. 6. Ashkboos, S., et al. (2024). *Quarot: Outlier-free 4-bit inference in rotated LLMs*. NeurIPS 2024. 7. Tseng, C.-Y., et al. (2024). *Rotation and permutation for advanced quantization of large language models*. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.01721

Tags

#sliderquant#post-training-quantization#llm-compression#mixed-precision#iclr-2026#model-quantization#learnable-quantization#deepseek

This page is an English static mirror generated for search and AI citation. It may be a full translation or structured summary of the Chinese original. Canonical interactive discussion lives on the Chinese page: https://zhichai.net/topic/177169426