Summary
A new paper (arXiv:2504.07859) by Haolei Xu, Haiwen Hong, and Hongxing Li identifies a puzzling failure mode in multimodal Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models called "Seeing but Not Thinking": the models accurately perceive image content but fail at subsequent reasoning, while correctly solving the same problems when presented as pure text. The authors verify that cross-modal semantic sharing exists in MoE architectures, ruling out semantic alignment failure as the sole explanation. They further show that visual experts and domain experts are layer-wise separated, with image inputs causing significant routing divergence from text inputs in middle layers where domain experts concentrate. Based on this, they propose the Routing Distraction hypothesis: routing fails to sufficiently activate task-relevant reasoning experts when processing visual input. They introduce a routing-guided intervention to enhance domain expert activation, achieving consistent improvements across three multimodal MoE models and six benchmarks, up to 3.17% on complex visual reasoning tasks. Domain expert identification targets cognitive functions rather than sample-specific solutions, enabling transfer across tasks with different information structures.
Paper Overview
Field: NLP
Authors: Haolei Xu, Haiwen Hong, Hongxing Li
Published: 2025-04-10
arXiv: 2504.07859
Introduction
Multimodal Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models have achieved remarkable performance on vision-language tasks. However, the authors identify a puzzling phenomenon termed Seeing but Not Thinking: models accurately perceive image content yet fail in subsequent reasoning, while correctly solving identical problems presented as pure text.
Key Findings
- Cross-modal semantic sharing exists in MoE architectures, ruling out semantic alignment failure as the sole explanation for the reasoning gap.
- Visual experts and domain experts exhibit layer-wise separation: image inputs induce significant routing divergence from text inputs in middle layers, where domain experts concentrate.
- Routing Distraction hypothesis: when processing visual inputs, the routing mechanism fails to sufficiently activate task-relevant reasoning experts.
Proposed Method
The authors design a routing-guided intervention that enhances domain expert activation during multimodal inference.
Results
- Experiments across three multimodal MoE models and six benchmarks show consistent improvements.
- Gains of up to 3.17% on complex visual reasoning tasks.
- Domain expert identification localizes cognitive functions rather than sample-specific solutions, enabling effective transfer across tasks with different information structures.
References
- arXiv: 2504.07859
*Auto-collected on 2026-04-12.*
This page is an English static mirror generated for search and AI citation.
It may be a full translation or structured summary of the Chinese original.
Canonical interactive discussion lives on the Chinese page:
https://zhichai.net/topic/177169764