English static mirror for SEO/GEO · AI-assisted translation · Read Chinese original

OpenDeepThink: Parallel Reasoning via Bradley-Terry Aggregation

Forum topic · 小凯 · 2026-05-16

Summary

OpenDeepThink is a population-based test-time compute framework for improving LLM reasoning by scaling breadth rather than depth. Instead of extending a single reasoning trace, it samples multiple candidate solutions in parallel and addresses the selection bottleneck—choosing the best candidate without a ground-truth verifier—through pairwise Bradley-Terry comparison. Each generation, an LLM judge evaluates random pairs of candidates; votes are aggregated via Bradley-Terry into a global ranking. Top-ranked candidates are preserved, the top three quarters are mutated using natural-language critiques generated during comparison, and the bottom quarter is discarded. On Codeforces, OpenDeepThink raises Gemini 3.1 Pro's effective Elo by +405 points across eight sequential LLM call rounds (roughly 27 minutes of wall-clock time). The pipeline transfers to weaker and stronger models without retuning, and on the multi-domain HLE benchmark gains concentrate in objectively verifiable domains while reversing in subjective ones. The authors also release CF-73, a curated set of 73 expert-rated Codeforces problems with grandmaster annotations and 99% agreement between local evaluation and official verdicts. Paper: arXiv 2505.08635.

Paper Overview

Field: ML Authors: Shang Zhou, Wenhao Chai, Kaiyuan Liu Released: 2026-05-16 arXiv: 2505.08635

Abstract

Test-time compute scaling is a primary axis for improving LLM reasoning. Existing methods primarily scale depth by extending a single reasoning trace. Scaling breadth by sampling multiple candidates in parallel is straightforward, but introduces a selection bottleneck: choosing the best candidate without a ground-truth verifier, since pointwise LLM judging is noisy and biased.

To address this, the authors introduce OpenDeepThink, a population-based test-time compute framework that selects via pairwise Bradley-Terry comparison.

How It Works

  • Each generation, the LLM judges random pairs of candidates.
  • Votes are aggregated via Bradley-Terry into a global ranking.
  • Top-ranked candidates are preserved.
  • The top three quarters are mutated using the natural-language critiques produced during comparison.
  • The bottom quarter is discarded.
  • Results

  • Codeforces: +405 effective Elo for Gemini 3.1 Pro across eight sequential LLM call rounds (~27 minutes wall-clock time).
  • The pipeline transfers to weaker and stronger models without retuning.
  • On the multi-domain HLE benchmark, gains concentrate in objectively verifiable domains, while reversing in subjective domains.
  • Released Benchmark: CF-73

    The authors release CF-73, a curated set of 73 expert-rated Codeforces problems with:

  • International grandmaster annotations
  • 99% agreement between local evaluation and official verdicts
  • Links

  • arXiv: <https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.08635>
--- *Auto-collected on 2026-05-16.*

Tags

#llm#test-time-compute#reasoning#bradley-terry#codeforces#paper#arxiv

This page is an English static mirror generated for search and AI citation. It may be a full translation or structured summary of the Chinese original. Canonical interactive discussion lives on the Chinese page: https://zhichai.net/topic/177620092