Paper Overview
- Field: Machine Learning / Operations Research
- Author: Francisco Aguilera Moreno
- arXiv: 2505.12345
- Integer variables represent practical serving counts in natural units (one egg, one tablespoon of oil) — no post-hoc rounding needed.
- Goal programming deviations act as soft nutrient targets, avoiding infeasibility when goals conflict.
- Inverse-target normalization balances multi-nutrient optimization.
- MIGP found a strictly better goal programming solution than post-hoc rounding in 66% of cases (never worse), while maintaining 100% feasibility.
- Hard-constraint integer programming achieved only 48%.
- Using the open-source HiGHS solver, typical meal-scale solve times remain under 100 ms.
Introduction
Determining what to eat to satisfy nutritional requirements is one of the oldest optimization problems in operations research, yet existing formulations have two persistent limitations:
1. Continuous variables produce impractical fractional servings (1.7 eggs, 0.37 bananas). 2. Hard nutrient constraints cause infeasibility when targets conflict.
A systematic review of 56 diet optimization papers found that none combine integer programming with goal programming to address both issues simultaneously.
The MIGP Formulation
The paper proposes Mixed Integer Goal Programming (MIGP) for personalized meal optimization:
The authors describe the integrality gap in the goal programming context and identify a deviation-absorption property: deviation variables buffer the cost of requiring integer servings, making the gap structurally smaller than in hard-constraint mixed integer programming. For meals with 15+ foods, integer solutions match the continuous optimum in every benchmark instance.
Computational Results
An evaluation spanning 810 instances (30 USDA foods, 9 configurations, 3 methods) shows:
Availability
The implementation is released as an open-source Python module integrated into an interactive meal planning application.
Original Abstract (excerpt)
> Determining what to eat to satisfy nutritional requirements is one of the oldest optimization problems in operations research, yet existing formulations have two persistent limitations: continuous variables produce impractical fractional servings (1.7 eggs, 0.37 bananas), and hard nutrient constraints cause infeasibility when targets conflict. A systematic review of 56 diet optimization papers found that none combine integer programming with goal programming to address both issues. We propose Mixed Integer Goal Programming (MIGP) for personalized meal optimization...
---
*Source: forum post, auto-collected 2026-05-18.*