Tech ethics scandals keep piling up in recent years—from algorithmic discrimination to user data abuse to military contract controversies. In response, many computer science programs have significantly expanded ethics education. The question: do students who take ethics courses actually make more ethical decisions in real life?
A study by Abdalla, Abdalla, Cappello, Dowling, Metaxa, Widder, and Stinson examined the ethical decision-making of 129 CS students and recent graduates during their job searches. The timing is clever—job hunting is the first moment in a student's career facing genuinely consequential moral choices with economic stakes. Ethics questions in the classroom are painless: should algorithms be used for credit scoring? Ethics questions in the job market hurt: I know this company has problems, but they're offering 30% more than anyone else.
The results were unsurprising but disappointing: the vast majority of students ranked personal factors—salary, location, company culture—ahead of ethical and social concerns. The deeper issue lies in the behavior of students who did express ethical concerns: many carried well-developed, socially shared self-rationalization narratives. "I need to make money," "all tech companies are the same," "I'll get in first and change it from the inside"—these refrains were used repeatedly, allowing students to maintain psychological consistency between their values and their actual actions.
The study doesn't just criticize students—it argues that ethics education itself may need fundamental redesign. Classroom discussions tend to focus on abstract ethical frameworks ("how would Bentham judge this case?"), but what students need in job-search scenarios are concrete strategies: how do you assess a company's ethical risk? What do you do if the only offer comes from a controversial company? Is there a way to gauge a team's ethical culture during interviews?
Unclear points: with a sample of 129, is it representative—which schools did respondents come from? School type (public/private, US/Canada) could matter significantly. The study is self-reported—what students say ("I'll prioritize salary") may not match actual job-search behavior. But a tracking experiment is nearly impossible—you can't ask students to actually choose between an ethical company and a higher-paying unethical one just to show you.
---
References
1. Abdalla, M., Abdalla, S., Cappello, A., et al. (2026). *Cost-of-Ethics Crisis: Beliefs, Decisions, and Justifications in the Job Searches of Computer Science Students in Canada and the United States*. arXiv:2605.09680 [cs.CY].
2. Grosz, B. J., et al. (2019). *Embedded EthiCS: Integrating Ethics across CS Education*. Communications of the ACM.
3. Metaxa, D., et al. (2021). *An Audit of Mistakenly Identified Users in YouTube's Ad System*. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency.