Pre-training neural operators to solve PDEs is a frontier direction: one pre-trained model can be reused across many PDE types, avoiding the cost of retraining from scratch. But as the variety of PDEs grows, a prominent problem emerges — solution operators differ drastically in structure. Diffusion equations are smooth, advection equations are sharp, and reaction-diffusion equations exhibit complex multi-scale behavior. Existing approaches try to cover this diversity with ever-larger models.
Lv, Wang, Hao, Wu, Xu, Zhou, Wu, and Zhang propose the opposite idea: don't scale the model — transform the operator. If the solution operator is transformed into a simpler, more unified form before training, a mid-sized model can cover the entire operator family.
The key is that the transformation must be adaptive and input-dependent. The same PDE has differently shaped solution operators under different parameters. The transformation mechanism expands hidden representations into multiple parallel streams, adaptively aggregating and redistributing the information flow before and after each sublayer. Mixing between streams is done via doubly stochastic matrices computed with Sinkhorn projection.
Results
- Across 12 PDE benchmarks, AOT-POT achieves state-of-the-art performance with only 3% additional parameters.
- Relative L2 error reduced by up to 77.6% (average 40.9%).
- After fine-tuning: error drops 92% on in-distribution PDEs and 89% on out-of-distribution types (previously unseen categories).
- Stability conditions of Sinkhorn-projected doubly stochastic matrices during training — how many iterations are needed for convergence?
- How is the number of parallel streams chosen — does it need to grow with the number of PDE types?
- Does the model still benefit from the transformation on very uncommon PDE types, or does that require a more aggressive transformation strategy?
The most interesting takeaway
The most interesting conclusion isn't in the numbers: "operator transformation" is inspired by classical numerical analysis — preconditioners have been used in traditional PDE solvers for decades. The authors transplant the same idea into neural networks, turning "carefully hand-crafting a preconditioner for each PDE" into "letting the network learn how to do the preconditioning itself."
Open questions
References
1. Lv, Q., Wang, H., Hao, Z., et al. (2026). *AOT-POT: Adaptive Operator Transformation for Large-Scale PDE Pre-training*. arXiv:2605.15793 [cs.LG]. 2. Lu, L., et al. (2021). *DeepONet: Learning Nonlinear Operators for Identifying Differential Equations Based on the Universal Approximation Theorem of Operators*. Nature Machine Intelligence. 3. Li, Z., et al. (2021). *Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations*. ICLR.