This post (originally in Chinese, part five of a series) describes a reproducible, AI-agent-powered pipeline for empirical academic research, built on the repository Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research.
Key points
- The core problem: Empirical research has five time-consuming stages — finding data, running regressions, writing papers, reviewer responses, and defense. AI knows individual technical moves but not the complete workflow; Skills encode a senior researcher's methodology into structured workflows.
- Data access via MCP servers: One command replaces weeks of manual downloads:
- Reproduction in 10 minutes: A Stata Skill parses
.dofiles line by line and maps commands to Python equivalents (reghdfe→pyfixest,ivreg2→linearmodels), reproducing coefficients, standard errors, and significance from an AER paper. Three paths exist: Stata→Python translation, explicit Python (Full Empirical Analysis Skill), and Agent-native DSL (StatsPAI, 900+ functions). - Autonomous research systems:
- Agent Laboratory (5,500 stars): full literature→experiment→report pipeline, claims 84% cost reduction.
- AI-Scientist-v2 (Sakana AI): first AI-written paper claimed to pass peer review.
- ARIS: overnight autonomous research tasks.
- Reviewer response automation: The
review-responsetool classifies reviewer comments, drafts point-by-point replies, and generates supplementary analysis code — reportedly compressing a 6–8 month cycle to 2 weeks.AI-research-feedbacksimulates six top-journal reviewers across identification credibility, causal over-claiming, robustness, contribution clarity, methodological rigor, and writing.paper-slide-deckconverts papers to presentation slides. - Multi-agent collaboration = peer-review logic: A single agent that both writes and reviews cannot self-critique. CoPaper.AI uses a Supervisor plus four sub-agents (Preparation, Modeling with 20 methods including DID/IV/RD/PSM/DML, Visualization, Writing) with intelligent task routing. HKU AI-Researcher (NeurIPS 2025 Spotlight) runs full literature review → hypothesis generation → implementation → writing. DeepAnalyze (Renmin University) supports fully Chinese-language workflows.
- Ecosystem maturity: ClawHub (13,729 skills), VoltAgent (5,400+), antigravity (1,340+, 28,000 stars) aggregate 20,000+ skills; Anthropic published a 32-page Claude Code Skills guide, and the main repository's 52 skills passed security scanning (52/52 CLEAN).
- Data permissions remain human-only: CFPS/CHARLS require account applications; Wind/CEIC/Bloomberg need institutional subscriptions; APIs rate-limit bulk requests.
- Translation equivalence trap: Stata→Python guarantees numerical but not methodological equivalence (convergence criteria, small-sample corrections, clustering details differ across packages). Human verification is essential.
- Multi-agent coordination costs: context overhead, error propagation between agents, and debugging complexity. Reported 20-minute papers likely reflect happy-path, clean data scenarios.
- AI-Scientist-v2's milestone needs scrutiny: which venue, was it double-blind, and did it survive full review or merely initial screening? Promotional value may exceed academic value.
- Fragmentation: 20,000+ skills of uneven quality, many unreviewed prompt wrappers or outdated.
- Main repo: https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research
- CoPaper.AI: https://copaper.ai
- Agent Laboratory: https://github.com/SamuelSchmidgall/AgentLaboratory
- AI-Scientist-v2: https://github.com/SakanaAI/AI-Scientist-v2
- DeepAnalyze: https://github.com/ruc-datalab/DeepAnalyze
- HKU AI-Researcher: https://github.com/HKUDS/AI-Researcher
- ClawHub: https://clawhub.com
- FRED MCP: https://github.com/stefanoamorelli/fred-mcp-server
- OpenAlex MCP: https://github.com/oksure/openalex-research-mcp
| MCP server | Scale | Coverage | |---|---|---| | FRED | 800k+ time series | Federal Reserve, US macro | | World Bank | 1000+ indicators, 200+ countries | Development indicators | | US Gov Open Data | 40+ APIs | Census/CDC/FDA/FEC | | DataGouv (France) | National open data | French official statistics |
Chinese microdata (CFPS, CGSS, CHARLS, CHIP, CHFS) is accessible via MCP interfaces or aggregators. OpenAlex (240M works) plus Semantic Scholar, arXiv, PubMed, and CrossRef form an academic data federation.
Honest limitations
Conclusion
AI is an amplifier, not a replacement: it compresses months of grunt work (data hunting, robustness checks, formatting, reviewer replies) into hours, while research judgment — question significance, identification credibility, policy implications — remains the researcher's domain, made more valuable by reclaimed time.
References