Paper Overview
Field: NLP Authors: Sondos Mahmoud Bsharat, Jiacheng Liu, Xiaohan Zhao arXiv: 2606.06481
Key Points
- As AI writing assistants become increasingly integrated into real-world drafting and revision workflows, many documents are no longer purely human-written or AI-generated, but result from progressive human-AI co-editing.
- Existing AI-text detection benchmarks largely focus on final outputs and offer limited understanding of how AI authorship signals emerge, accumulate, or disappear throughout the revision process.
- The authors introduce OpAI-Bench, an operation-guided benchmark for studying progressive human-to-AI text transformation across document, sentence, token, and span granularities.
- Starting from human-written documents, OpAI-Bench constructs nine sequentially revised versions per sample under predefined AI coverage levels and five representative AI edit operations, covering four domains, while preserving full multi-granularity authorship provenance.
- The benchmark supports comprehensive evaluation of 8 document-level, 7 sentence-level, and 2 fine-grained token/span detectors.
- AI-text detectability is controlled not only by the proportion of AI-edited content but also by the edit operation, domain, and cumulative revision history.
- Mixed-authorship intermediate versions are often harder to detect than purely human and heavily AI-edited endpoints, exposing non-monotonic detection patterns that existing benchmarks miss.
- OpAI-Bench provides a controlled testbed for analyzing when and how AI-assisted writing becomes detectable in realistic progressive editing scenarios.
- arXiv abstract: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06481