Paper Overview
Research Area: Machine Learning Authors: James Flora, Mitchell Black, Weng-Keen Wong Published: 2025-06-13 arXiv: 2506.10664
Abstract
Positional encodings (PEs) enhance the power of graph neural networks (GNNs), both theoretically and empirically. Two of the most popular families of PEs - spectral (e.g., Laplacian eigenspaces, effective resistance) and walk-based (polynomials of the adjacency matrix) - are theoretically equivalent in expressive power, with expressivity between the 1-WL and 3-WL tests. However, this equivalence assumes the GNN uses the "complete" version of these PEs, which requires \(O(n^3)\) time and space complexity. Instead, practitioners commonly use truncated variants of these encodings, such as the first \(k\) eigenspaces or powers of the adjacency matrix. However, the theoretical properties of these truncated PEs are unknown. In this work, the authors initiate the study of these truncated PEs.
Key Points
- Theoretical separation under truncation: While complete spectral and walk-based PEs are equivalent in expressive power, the paper shows that once truncated, several families of PEs differ fundamentally in what they can express.
- Truncated spectral PEs vs. 1-WL: As a corollary, truncated spectral PEs are no longer guaranteed to be strictly more powerful than the 1-WL test.
- k-harmonic distances: The authors study a family of spectral PEs, k-harmonic distances, to highlight expressivity differences even among closely related truncated spectral PEs.
- Practical recommendation: Experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that combining (mixing) truncated PE families outperforms using any single PE family alone.
Takeaway
The equivalence results established for complete positional encodings do not carry over to the truncated versions used in practice. This work provides the first theoretical framework for reasoning about truncated PEs and suggests practitioners should mix PE families rather than rely on a single truncated encoding.
--- *Auto-collected on 2026-06-13*