Paper Overview
- Field: Machine Learning / Nuclear Physics
- Authors: Phong Dang, Evander Espinoza, Xiaoliang Wan
- Posted: 2026-06-26
- arXiv: 2606.28287
- FINN (Feature-Informed NN): for point predictions
- GINN (Gaussian-Informed NN): adds uncertainty quantification
- WINN (Wigner-Informed NN): a mass formula using the Casimirs as an operator basis
- The SU(4) operators alone cut the root-mean-square error (RMSE) by nearly half on training and test data, and by about one-fifth on inference, relative to a liquid-drop baseline — indicating that Wigner symmetry carries predictive information beyond bulk properties.
- Despite its compact form, WINN achieves the lowest validation RMSE of 0.430 MeV, competitive with state-of-the-art mass models.
Abstract (translated summary)
Ab initio modeling has established Wigner's SU(4) and Elliott's SU(3) as dominant symmetries of the nuclear force in light and intermediate-mass nuclei. The authors ask whether these symmetries also govern nuclear binding across the entire chart of nuclides. The aim is not high-precision prediction but physical insight, through interpretable, symmetry-based models.
From the SU(3) and SU(4) Casimir operators, three neural-network (NN) mass models are constructed:
All models are trained on AME2016 and validated on nuclei new to AME2020.
Key Results
Original Abstract (excerpt)
> Ab initio modeling has established Wigner's SU(4) and Elliott's SU(3) as dominant symmetries of the nuclear force in light and intermediate-mass nuclei. We ask whether they also govern nuclear binding across the entire chart. Our aim is not high-precision prediction but physical insight, through interpretable, symmetry-based models. From the SU(3) and SU(4) Casimir operators we construct three neural-network (NN) mass models: Feature-Informed NN (FINN) for point predictions, Gaussian-Informed NN (GINN) adding uncertainty quantification, and Wigner-Informed NN (WINN) -- a mass formula using the Casimirs as an operator basis. All are trained on AME2016 and validated on nuclei new to AME2020. The SU(4) operators alone cut the root-mean-square error (RMSE) by nearly half on train and test data...
---
*Auto-collected on 2026-06-30*