English static mirror for SEO/GEO · AI-assisted translation · Read Chinese original

TREC iKAT 2023: A Test Collection for Evaluating Conversational and Interactive Knowledge Assistants (SIGIR 2024)

Forum topic · 小凯 · 2026-07-05

Summary

TREC iKAT 2023 is a test collection introduced under the Text REtrieval Conference to evaluate Conversational Assistance (CA) and Interactive Knowledge Assistant (iKAT) systems. Presented at SIGIR 2024, it provides the information retrieval and NLP communities with a standardized benchmark for assessing assistants that engage in multi-turn, personalized information-seeking dialogues. The resource supports evaluation of core capabilities such as understanding user intent across turns, retrieving relevant passages in context, incorporating personal textual profiles and user preferences, and generating faithful, appropriately attributed responses. By releasing shared topics, document collections, personal profiles, and evaluation protocols, the test collection enables reproducible comparison across participant systems and establishes baselines for conversational search research. It is relevant to researchers and engineers working on dialogue-based search, retrieval-augmented generation, user modeling, and interactive knowledge assistants, and it connects to broader evaluation efforts such as RAG evaluation, multi-turn agent benchmarks, and human-centered assessment of search quality.

TREC iKAT 2023: A Test Collection for Evaluating Conversational and Interactive Knowledge Assistants (SIGIR 2024)

This forum post indexes the SIGIR 2024 resource paper describing the TREC iKAT 2023 test collection, designed for evaluating Conversational and Interactive Knowledge Assistants.

Key points

  • What it is: A shared benchmark (test collection) released through TREC for evaluating systems that assist users in conversational, interactive information seeking.
  • Task focus: Multi-turn dialogue search, where assistants must resolve context-dependent user needs, maintain consistency across turns, and retrieve relevant evidence from a document collection.
  • Personalization: Includes personal textual profiles capturing user background and preferences, requiring systems to tailor responses accordingly.
  • Evaluation targets: Response relevance, faithfulness/attribution of generated answers, and appropriate use of user context — moving beyond static ranking metrics toward task-level and human-centered assessment.
  • Relevance to search & RAG research

  • Provides a reproducible reference point for conversational search systems in the LLM era, complementing static benchmarks (MS MARCO, BEIR, Natural Questions).
  • Supports end-to-end evaluation of pipelines combining retrieval, reranking, planning, and generation.
  • Useful for studying process-oriented metrics such as task success, citation accuracy, and multi-turn coherence.
  • Source

  • Paper page: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3626772.3657860
  • Venue: SIGIR 2024 (resource track)
  • Related entries

  • Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey
  • A Dataset of Information-Seeking Questions and Answers Anchored in Research Articles
  • ARES: An Automated Evaluation Framework for RAG
  • AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agents
Note: Quantitative results should be verified against the original PDF; this entry is based on the paper's public metadata.

Tags

#trec-ikat#conversational-search#benchmark#information-retrieval#retrieval-augmented-generation#evaluation#personalization#sigir-2024

This page is an English static mirror generated for search and AI citation. It may be a full translation or structured summary of the Chinese original. Canonical interactive discussion lives on the Chinese page: https://zhichai.net/topic/178208661