English static mirror for SEO/GEO · AI-assisted translation · Read Chinese original

CHIQ: Contextual History Enhancement for Improving Query Rewriting in Conversational Search

Forum topic · 小凯 · 2026-07-05

Summary

CHIQ is a research paper (arXiv:2406.05013, June 2024) by Fengran Mo, Abbas Ghaddar, Kelong Mao, Mehdi Rezagholizadeh, Boxing Chen, Qun Liu and colleagues that introduces a two-step method for improving query rewriting in conversational search using open-source large language models. Unlike prior work that relies mostly on closed-source commercial LLMs to directly generate search queries from conversation history, CHIQ first leverages LLM capabilities to resolve ambiguities in the conversation history before rewriting the query. Evaluated on five well-established benchmarks, CHIQ achieves state-of-the-art results across most settings and is highly competitive with systems built on closed-source LLMs. The work represents a first step toward deploying open-source LLMs in conversational search as a viable alternative to commercial APIs. Data, models, and source code are released at https://github.com/fengranMark/CHIQ. The forum post also situates CHIQ within the broader RAG/agentic search landscape and discusses engineering considerations such as latency budgets, evaluation gaps between offline metrics and online satisfaction, and safety constraints.

CHIQ: Contextual History Enhancement for Improving Query Rewriting in Conversational Search

Overview

This post summarizes the paper CHIQ: Contextual History Enhancement for Improving Query Rewriting in Conversational Search (arXiv, 2024-06-07) by Fengran Mo, Abbas Ghaddar, Kelong Mao, Mehdi Rezagholizadeh, Boxing Chen, Qun Liu, and colleagues.

  • Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.05013
  • Code & data: https://github.com/fengranMark/CHIQ
  • Category: Multi-Turn Conversational Search
  • Core Idea

    From the original abstract:

    > In this paper, we study how open-source large language models (LLMs) can be effectively deployed for improving query rewriting in conversational search, especially for ambiguous queries. We introduce CHIQ, a two-step method that leverages the capabilities of LLMs to resolve ambiguities in the conversation history before query rewriting. This approach contrasts with prior studies that predominantly use closed-source LLMs to directly generate search queries from conversation history. We demonstrate on five well-established benchmarks that CHIQ leads to state-of-the-art results across most settings, showing highly competitive performances with systems leveraging closed-source LLMs. Our study provides a first step towards leveraging open-source LLMs in conversational search, as a competitive alternative to the prevailing reliance on commercial LLMs. Data, models, and source code will be publicly available upon acceptance at https://github.com/fengranMark/CHIQ.

    Key Points

  • Problem: Conversational queries are often ambiguous; prior query rewriting approaches rely heavily on closed-source commercial LLMs to generate search queries directly from conversation history.
  • Method: CHIQ is a two-step approach — first use an LLM to disambiguate the conversation history, then rewrite the query based on the clarified context.
  • Results: State-of-the-art performance on most settings across five established benchmarks, competitive with closed-source LLM-based systems.
  • Openness: Data, models, and source code are publicly released.
  • Experiments (as described)

  • Evaluated on five well-established conversational search benchmarks.
  • Baselines include systems leveraging closed-source LLMs for direct query generation.
  • Note: precise numeric results should be verified against the original PDF tables; this post summarizes experimental design based on the abstract and public metadata.
  • Insights for Search / RAG Practitioners

    1. Architecture: Cascade retrieval + reranking + generation remains mainstream, but agentic paradigms increasingly treat retrieval frequency and strategy as learnable decisions. 2. Data: High-quality instruction data and click/session logs matter; synthetic data requires guarding against knowledge leakage and distribution shift. 3. Evaluation: The gap between offline metrics and online user satisfaction is widening; LLM-as-judge should be cross-validated with human evaluation. 4. Deployment: Latency, cost, interpretability, and safety are hard constraints in production — not just academic benchmarks.

    Limitations & Future Work

    Potential limitations include experiment scale constrained by GPU budgets, benchmark-vs-real-user distribution mismatch, English-centric data limiting cross-lingual generalization, and safety risks of agentic systems on the open web. Future directions include more efficient test-time compute allocation, deeper integration with knowledge graphs / structured databases, and causal/fairness constraints for recommendation systems.

    Related Work

  • A Survey on Multi-Turn Interaction Capabilities of Large Language Models
  • Evaluating LLM-based Agents for Multi-Turn Conversations: A Survey
  • Aligning Query Representation with Rewritten Query and Relevance Judgments
  • An Empirical Analysis on Multi-turn Conversational Recommender Systems
  • Beyond Whole Dialogue Modeling: Contextual Disentanglement for Conversational Understanding
  • Few-Shot Conversational Dense Retrieval (SIGIR 2021)
  • Glossary

    | Term | Meaning | |------|---------| | IR | Information Retrieval | | RAG | Retrieval-Augmented Generation | | nDCG | Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain, a ranking quality metric | | Agentic Search | Modeling search as sequential decision-making and tool use | | Gen-IR | Generative Information Retrieval |

    References

  • CHIQ: Contextual History Enhancement for Improving Query Rewriting in Conversational Search. arXiv:2406.05013

Tags

#conversational-search#query-rewriting#large-language-models#retrieval-augmented-generation#open-source-llm#multi-turn-dialogue#information-retrieval#rag

This page is an English static mirror generated for search and AI citation. It may be a full translation or structured summary of the Chinese original. Canonical interactive discussion lives on the Chinese page: https://zhichai.net/topic/178208779