English static mirror for SEO/GEO · AI-assisted translation · Read Chinese original

Leveraging Large Language Models for Sequential Recommendation (RecSys 2023)

Forum topic · 小凯 · 2026-07-05

Summary

This post indexes the RecSys 2023 paper "Leveraging Large Language Models for Sequential Recommendation," published in the ACM Digital Library (DOI: 10.1145/3604915.3610639). The work sits at the intersection of large language models (LLMs) and sequential recommendation, addressing how LLMs can reshape traditional recommendation pipelines where retrieval, ranking, and generation are typically handled separately. The surrounding commentary frames the paper within broader trends in search, recommendation, and personalization: the shift from cascade architectures toward agentic paradigms where retrieval frequency and strategy become learnable; the importance of high-quality instruction data and click/session logs; the growing gap between offline metrics and online user satisfaction; and hard production constraints around latency, cost, explainability, and safety. The post also provides an engineering checklist covering data privacy, p99 latency budgets, quality validation via interleaving experiments, retrieval poisoning defenses, and per-query token costs, plus a glossary of terms (RAG, LTR, nDCG, agentic search, generative IR). Readers are advised to cross-reference the original PDF for quantitative results, as specific experimental numbers are not reproduced in the post. It is categorized under Recommender Engines and Sequential Recommendation.

Leveraging Large Language Models for Sequential Recommendation (RecSys 2023)

Overview

This entry indexes the academic paper "Leveraging Large Language Models for Sequential Recommendation", presented at RecSys 2023.

| Field | Detail | |-------|--------| | Venue | RecSys 2023 | | Source | https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3604915.3610639 | | Type | Academic paper | | Categories | Recommender Engines, Sequential Recommendation |

> Note: The forum post is largely a template entry. Specific experimental results and method details should be verified against the original PDF at the ACM link above.

Key points

  • The paper explores applying large language models (LLMs) to sequential recommendation, a core topic in modern recommender systems research.
  • Contextual motivation: traditional recommendation pipelines split retrieval, ranking, and generation into separate stages, which struggles to meet LLM-era demands for natural-language interaction, multi-hop reasoning, and up-to-date knowledge.
  • The work is positioned at the intersection of recommendation and large-scale search/personalization systems, addressing how responsibilities between retrieval, ranking, generation, and tool use should be redistributed in the LLM era.
  • Broader context from the entry

    Research trends discussed

  • Architecture: Cascade retrieve → rerank → generate remains mainstream, but agentic paradigms are making retrieval count and strategy themselves learnable.
  • Data: High-quality instruction data and click/session logs are both critical; synthetic data must guard against knowledge leakage and distribution shift.
  • Evaluation: The gap between offline metrics and online satisfaction is widening; LLM-as-judge should be cross-validated with human evaluation.
  • Productization: Latency, cost, explainability, and safety are hard constraints for industrial deployment — academic benchmarks alone are insufficient.
  • Engineering deployment checklist

    | Item | Question | Suggestion | |------|----------|------------| | Data | Does training/indexing contain PII? How are versions managed? | Partitioned indexes, anonymization, rollback-capable embedding versions | | Latency | What is the p99 budget? How many retrieval steps? | Cascade + early stopping, caching hot queries, async reranking | | Quality | Do offline gains translate to online CTR/satisfaction? | Interleaving experiments, human audit samples, citation verification | | Safety | Does open retrieval introduce poisoning/bias? | Source whitelists, adversarial detection, output filtering | | Cost | Token and GPU cost per query? | Route to smaller models, distillation, hybrid sparse+dense retrieval |

    Glossary

    | Term | Meaning | |------|---------| | IR | Information Retrieval | | RAG | Retrieval-Augmented Generation | | LTR | Learning to Rank | | nDCG | Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain, a ranking quality metric | | Agentic Search | Modeling search as sequential decision-making and tool invocation | | Gen-IR | Generative Information Retrieval |

    Related entries

  • 360Brew: A Decoder-only Foundation Model for Personalized Ranking
  • Actions Speak Louder than Words: Trillion-Parameter Sequential Transducers
  • Augmenting Netflix Search with In-Session Adapted Recommendations
  • Bridging Language and Items for Retrieval and Recommendation
  • Data-efficient Fine-tuning for LLM-based Recommendation, SIGIR 2024
  • DiffKG: Knowledge Graph Diffusion Model for Recommendation, WSDM 2024
  • References

  • Original paper: Leveraging Large Language Models for Sequential Recommendation, RecSys 2023. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3604915.3610639

Tags

#llm#sequential-recommendation#recsys-2023#recommender-systems#retrieval-augmented-generation#personalization#information-retrieval

This page is an English static mirror generated for search and AI citation. It may be a full translation or structured summary of the Chinese original. Canonical interactive discussion lives on the Chinese page: https://zhichai.net/topic/178208917