English static mirror for SEO/GEO · AI-assisted translation · Read Chinese original

Survey: Large Language Models for Generative Information Extraction (Frontiers of Computer Science, 2024)

Forum topic · 小凯 · 2026-07-05

Summary

This forum post indexes a 2024 survey published in Frontiers of Computer Science titled "Large language models for generative information extraction: a survey." The survey systematically reviews how large language models (LLMs) transform information extraction (IE) from traditional discriminative, pipeline-based approaches into generative, unified frameworks. It covers core IE subtasks including named entity recognition, relation extraction, event extraction, and sentiment/aspect extraction, organizing existing methods by modeling paradigms, supervision settings, and integration patterns such as retrieval augmentation, instruction tuning, and tool use. The post situates the survey within the broader evolution of neural retrieval and extraction: from BERT-era encoders and dense retrieval, through retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), to agentic search systems that treat extraction as sequential decision-making. It also summarizes evaluation practices (nDCG, MRR, LLM-as-judge, human evaluation), open challenges such as hallucination, benchmark reliability, latency and cost constraints, and cross-lingual or multimodal generalization. The entry is part of a curated awesome-list of search and recommendation surveys and cross-references related surveys on agentic search, conversational search, and LLM-powered recommendation agents. Full details should be verified against the original PDF.

Survey: Large Language Models for Generative Information Extraction (Frontiers of Computer Science, 2024)

Overview

This entry catalogs a 2024 survey, "Large language models for generative information extraction: a survey", published in *Frontiers of Computer Science* (DOI: 10.1007/s11704-024-40555-y). It belongs to the "Search Surveys" section of the curated list.

  • Type: Survey
  • Link: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11704-024-40555-y.pdf
  • Key points

  • The survey examines the shift of information extraction (IE) from discriminative, task-specific pipelines toward generative, unified LLM-based frameworks.
  • It covers core IE subtasks: named entity recognition, relation extraction, event extraction, and related structured-prediction tasks.
  • Methods are organized along dimensions such as:
  • Modeling paradigm: encoder-based discriminative extraction vs. generative decoding of structured outputs.
  • LLM integration: RAG, instruction tuning, tool use, and agentic workflows.
  • Supervision settings: fully supervised, few-shot, zero-shot, and distantly supervised extraction.
  • The survey discusses interfaces with emerging paradigms including LLM tool calling, reinforcement learning, and multi-agent collaboration, plus transfer paths from research prototypes to industrial systems.
  • Open problems identified include: benchmark reliability, latency and cost, hallucination and safety, and cross-lingual / multimodal extension.
  • Context within neural retrieval and extraction

    The evolution traced by related work follows this timeline:

  • 2019–2021: BERT rerankers and dense retrieval (DPR) establish neural foundations.
  • 2022–2023: RAG-style retrieval–generation fusion matures.
  • 2024 onward: conversational/agentic search and generative recommendation expand rapidly; LLM-based generative IE becomes a major research direction.
  • Four main technical lines are typically contrasted:

  • Dense retrieval: high recall, low latency; suited for first-stage retrieval.
  • Late interaction (e.g., ColBERT): higher accuracy but larger index footprint.
  • Generative IR: directly "generating" documents or structured outputs, simplifying cascades.
  • Agentic approaches: modeling search/extraction as sequential decisions with multi-hop reasoning and self-reflection.
  • Evaluation practices

    Common datasets and metrics discussed in this research area:

  • Datasets: MS MARCO, BEIR, Natural Questions, domain-specific corpora.
  • Metrics: nDCG@10, MRR, Recall@k, Hit@k, human preference, task success rate, latency and token cost.
  • Baselines: BM25, dense retrieval, cross-encoder rerankers, retrieval-free LLMs.
  • Note: specific quantitative results should be verified against the original PDF tables.

    Takeaways for practitioners and researchers

    1. Architecture: cascaded retrieval + rerank + generation remains mainstream, but agentic paradigms treat the retrieval strategy itself as learnable. 2. Data: high-quality instruction data and click/session logs are critical; synthetic data requires care to avoid leakage and distribution shift. 3. Evaluation: the gap between offline metrics and online satisfaction is widening; LLM-as-judge should be cross-validated with human assessment. 4. Deployment: latency, cost, interpretability, and safety are hard constraints for industrial adoption—do not optimize academic benchmarks alone.

    Related entries

  • A Comprehensive Survey on Reinforcement Learning-based Agentic Search
  • A Survey of Conversational Search, Oct 2024, arXiv
  • A Survey of LLM Empowered Agents for Recommendation
  • A Survey of Model Architectures in Information Retrieval, Jan 2025
  • A Survey on AI Search with Large Language Models, July 2025
  • A Survey on Knowledge-Oriented RAG, Mar 2025
  • Glossary

    | Term | Meaning | |------|---------| | IE | Information Extraction | | RAG | Retrieval-Augmented Generation | | LTR | Learning to Rank | | nDCG | Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain | | Agentic Search | Search modeled as sequential decision-making and tool use | | Gen-IR | Generative Information Retrieval |

    References

  • Original paper: *Large language models for generative information extraction: a survey*, Frontiers of Computer Science, 2024. PDF

Tags

#large-language-models#information-extraction#survey#generative-ir#rag#nlp#information-retrieval

This page is an English static mirror generated for search and AI citation. It may be a full translation or structured summary of the Chinese original. Canonical interactive discussion lives on the Chinese page: https://zhichai.net/topic/178208977