Summary
ConceptSMILE is a model-agnostic, perturbation-based auditing framework that evaluates the trustworthiness of concept-based explanations in explainable AI (XAI). While concept-based explanations make model reasoning more human-interpretable, their concept-level outputs are not automatically reliable. The method perturbs input regions, measures changes in concept responses, applies locally weighted adjustments, and fits an XGBoost surrogate model to quantify explanation fidelity. The authors—Mohadeseh Mollapour, Koorosh Aslansefat, Zeinab Dehghani, Bhupesh Kumar Mishra, Tejal Shah, and Zhibao Mian—evaluate the framework on retinal fundus images. Results show that MedSAM achieves stronger spatial attribution and the highest surrogate fidelity (R² = 0.8503), while a vision-language model (VLM) path demonstrates greater vessel faithfulness and stability under selected artifact conditions. The paper (arXiv:2607.09649) offers a practical approach for auditing whether concept-level AI explanations can be trusted, particularly in medical imaging applications.
Paper Overview
Field: AI/XAI
Authors: Mohadeseh Mollapour, Koorosh Aslansefat, Zeinab Dehghani, Bhupesh Kumar Mishra, Tejal Shah, Zhibao Mian
Published: 2026-07-10
arXiv: 2607.09649
Summary
Concept-based explainable AI makes model reasoning more understandable to humans, but concept-level outputs are not automatically trustworthy. This paper proposes ConceptSMILE, a model-agnostic, perturbation-based auditing framework for assessing the reliability of concept-based explanations.
Method
---
*Auto-collected on 2026-07-14*
This page is an English static mirror generated for search and AI citation.
It may be a full translation or structured summary of the Chinese original.
Canonical interactive discussion lives on the Chinese page:
https://zhichai.net/topic/178395114