Paper Overview
- Field: cs.LG
- Authors: Hector J. Garcia, Nick Clayton
- Published: 2026-07-16
- arXiv: 2607.15242
- On KuaiRec, the mutable sketch achieves 0.810 RMSE reading only 1.8% of the data, vs. ALS at 0.822 RMSE with 100% data read.
- Per-batch updates are 8x faster.
- A new user receives personalized recommendations in <1 ms after their first rating, with no model retraining required.
- Sampling strategy comparison across density regimes: the KP-tree's norm-proportional sampling provides 40-130% better item coverage on sparse data (<1% density), while uniform sampling suffices on dense matrices.
Abstract (translated)
A common bottleneck in two-stage recommendation is embedding staleness: when a user rates a new item, their embedding remains fixed until the next retrain cycle. The authors propose mutable sketches, which store each user's preferences in a KP-tree (a sparse segment tree with sum aggregation), fit a low-rank projection once, and recompute embeddings on-the-fly as ratings arrive.They prove that each new observation monotonically tightens the prediction error envelope (Theorem 1), a guarantee that FunkSVD and eALS lack.
Key Results
Original Abstract
> A common bottleneck in two-stage recommendation is embedding staleness: when a user rates a new item, their embedding remains fixed until the next retrain cycle. We propose mutable sketches, which store each user's preferences in a KP-tree (a sparse segment tree with sum aggregation), fit a low-rank projection once, and recompute embeddings on-the-fly as ratings arrive. We prove that each new observation monotonically tightens the prediction error envelope (Theorem 1), a guarantee that FunkSVD and eALS lack. On KuaiRec, the mutable sketch achieves 0.810 RMSE at 1.8% data read vs. ALS 0.822 at 100%, with 8x faster per-batch updates. A new user receives personalized recommendations in <1 ms after their first rating, with no model retraining required. A comparison of sampling strategies across density regimes shows that the KP-tree's norm-proportional sampling provides 40-130% better item coverage on sparse data (<1% density), while uniform sampling suffices on dense matrices.--- *Auto-collected on 2026-07-20*