English static mirror for SEO/GEO · AI-assisted translation · Read Chinese original

From Values to Benchmarks: Evaluating Large Language Models for Governmental Use in Dutch

Forum topic · 小凯 · 2026-08-11

Summary

Large language models are increasingly deployed in governmental settings, but few evaluation frameworks jointly reflect public administration values and the linguistic needs of non-English contexts. This paper presents 'Grip on LLMs', a systematic evaluation suite for Dutch governmental use, developed with domain experts from a major Dutch municipal organisation. Using an advisory board process, user research, and a survey of civil-servant chatbot users, the authors identify six evaluation dimensions: factuality, honesty, social bias, energy consumption, cost, and training data transparency. These are operationalised into a benchmark suite covering more than 30 multilingual and Dutch-specific models. Results show no single model excels across all dimensions: higher quality consistently comes with greater environmental impact and financial cost, while bias is largely independent of both. Factuality and honesty are driven by different model attributes, so high factuality does not imply high honesty. A publicly accessible, user-friendly model overview supports stakeholders from engineers to policymakers in government LLM selection. arXiv: 2508.03803.

Overview

  • Field: NLP
  • Authors: Laurens Samson, Iva Gornishka, Gossa Lô
  • Published: 2026-08-11
  • arXiv: 2508.03803
  • Summary

    Large language models are increasingly being deployed in governmental settings, yet few existing evaluation frameworks jointly reflect the values of public administration and the linguistic requirements of non-English contexts. The authors present the 'Grip on LLMs' framework, a systematic evaluation suite for Dutch governmental use developed in collaboration with domain experts from a major Dutch municipal organisation.

    Through an advisory board process, user research, and a survey of the users of a civil-servant chatbot, they identify six evaluation dimensions (factuality, honesty, social bias, energy consumption, cost, and training data transparency) and operationalise them into a benchmark suite covering more than 30 multilingual and Dutch-specific models.

    Key findings

  • No single model excels on all dimensions; trade-offs are inevitable.
  • Higher quality consistently comes with greater environmental impact and financial cost, while social bias is largely independent of both.
  • Factuality (whether a model answers correctly) and honesty (whether it admits it does not know) are driven by different model attributes; high factuality does not imply high honesty.
  • To make these findings actionable for non-technical audiences, the authors release a publicly accessible, user-friendly model overview designed for the full range of stakeholders involved in government LLM selection, from engineers to policymakers.
---

*Auto-collected on 2026-08-12*

Tags

#nlp#large-language-models#benchmarking#government-ai#dutch-language#ai-ethics#responsible-ai#arxiv

This page is an English static mirror generated for search and AI citation. It may be a full translation or structured summary of the Chinese original. Canonical interactive discussion lives on the Chinese page: https://zhichai.net/topic/178633350