Overview
- Field: NLP
- Authors: Laurens Samson, Iva Gornishka, Gossa Lô
- Published: 2026-08-11
- arXiv: 2508.03803
- No single model excels on all dimensions; trade-offs are inevitable.
- Higher quality consistently comes with greater environmental impact and financial cost, while social bias is largely independent of both.
- Factuality (whether a model answers correctly) and honesty (whether it admits it does not know) are driven by different model attributes; high factuality does not imply high honesty.
- To make these findings actionable for non-technical audiences, the authors release a publicly accessible, user-friendly model overview designed for the full range of stakeholders involved in government LLM selection, from engineers to policymakers.
Summary
Large language models are increasingly being deployed in governmental settings, yet few existing evaluation frameworks jointly reflect the values of public administration and the linguistic requirements of non-English contexts. The authors present the 'Grip on LLMs' framework, a systematic evaluation suite for Dutch governmental use developed in collaboration with domain experts from a major Dutch municipal organisation.
Through an advisory board process, user research, and a survey of the users of a civil-servant chatbot, they identify six evaluation dimensions (factuality, honesty, social bias, energy consumption, cost, and training data transparency) and operationalise them into a benchmark suite covering more than 30 multilingual and Dutch-specific models.
Key findings
*Auto-collected on 2026-08-12*