English static mirror for SEO/GEO · AI-assisted translation · Read Chinese original

When AI's Family Tree Gets Rewritten: A Model Library Classification Revolution in easy-learn-ai

Forum topic · 小凯 · 2026-08-14

Summary

On July 12, 2026, developer lishiqi.conard restructured the easy-learn-ai project's AI model catalog from three large files (model.json, img.json, video.json) totaling nearly 6,000 lines into 19 vendor-based JSON files covering OpenAI, Alibaba, Zhipu AI, ByteDance, DeepSeek, Google, Moonshot, Baidu, Tencent, Anthropic, and more. This shift from capability-based to vendor-based classification reflects a broader industry trend: model identity increasingly derives from its maker and ecosystem rather than its abilities. The catalog reveals key patterns including DeepSeek's open-source R1 distillation family, Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.8 with 1M-token context, Alibaba's dual open-source/closed-source Qwen strategy, and Google's Gemini lineup. It also documents the context-window arms race (8K to 1M tokens), the open-source vs. closed-source divide, and the rising prevalence of tags like deep thinking, tool calling, and visual understanding. Based on commit e6c189a.

Overview

The easy-learn-ai project aims to compile a comprehensive reference of AI model information. Until July 12, 2026, all model data — text, image, and video generation models from every vendor — was crammed into three files (model.json, img.json, video.json) totaling nearly 6,000 lines of JSON, making lookup and maintenance painful.

On that date, developer lishiqi.conard restructured the catalog into 19 vendor-based files, reorganizing the entire collection by manufacturer.

Largest Vendor Files

| File | Lines | Representative model families | |------|-------|------------------------------| | openai.json | 981 | GPT series, o series | | alibaba.json | 752 | Qwen series | | zhipu-ai.json | 570 | ChatGLM series | | bytedance.json | 518 | Seed series | | deepseek.json | 487 | DeepSeek-R1/V3 series | | google.json | 421 | Gemini series | | anthropic.json | 373 | Claude series | | moonshot.json | 365 | Kimi series | | baidu.json | 362 | ERNIE series | | tencent.json | 353 | Hunyuan series |

Key Observations

From capability-based to vendor-based classification

The old structure asked "what can these models do?" (text/image/video); the new one asks "where do they come from?" The post argues that in 2026, model identity is increasingly about ecosystem: choosing a model means choosing OpenAI's APIs, self-hosting DeepSeek, or Alibaba Cloud.

DeepSeek: the open-source disruptor

deepseek.json lists ~20 models, from flagship DeepSeek-R1 to distillations (Distill-Qwen-1.5B/7B/14B/32B, Distill-Llama-8B/70B), each with a parent field pointing to R1 — a literal family tree. All are open source, with context windows of 64K–128K.

Anthropic: the safety-first flagship

The Claude lineup (Opus 4.6, Opus 4.8, Sonnet 4.6, Haiku 4.5) emphasizes agentic coding, long-context stability, tool-trigger reliability, and honesty. Claude Opus 4.8 supports a 1M-token context window.

Alibaba: hedging open and closed

Qwen3.5-Plus is open source (397B total params, 17B active, MMLU-Pro 87.8%, priced at 1/18 of Gemini 3 Pro), while Qwen3.7-Max and Qwen3.6-Plus are closed-source, exclusive to Alibaba Cloud Model Studio with 1M-token context.

Google: blurring flagship and speed

Gemini 2.0 Flash targets high throughput and low cost with 1M context and native multimodality; Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 77.1% on ARC-AGI-2; Gemini 3.5 Flash reportedly beats 3.1 Pro on several coding and agentic benchmarks despite being a "Flash" tier.

The context-window arms race

  • GPT-4 (2023): 8K
  • GPT-4o (2024): 128K
  • Gemini 2.0 Flash (2025): 1M
  • Claude Opus 4.8 (2026): 1M
  • Qwen3.7-Max (2026): 1M
  • The post argues that beyond ~1M tokens, AI shifts from a chat tool to a research assistant.

    Open source vs. closed source

  • Open: DeepSeek (nearly all), Alibaba (Qwen3.5), Meta (Llama), Zhipu AI (partial ChatGLM), Stability AI (image models)
  • Closed: OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Baidu, Moonshot, ByteDance (Seed)
Some companies straddle both; open-source leads in momentum, but closed-source leaders (GPT-5, Claude Opus 4.8, Gemini 3.5) still hold a narrowing technical edge.

Model tags reveal an evolution

Tag frequency across models shows a trajectory: text generation first, then visual understanding, then tool calling as standard on mid/high-end models — with deep thinking the hottest tag of 2025–2026.

Conclusion

The reorganization — from three files to nineteen, from capability to vendor — mirrors an industry shift: models are no longer standalone tools but entry points into ecosystems, flags on an expanding map of AI empires.

---

*Based on easy-learn-ai commit e6c189a.*

Tags

#ai-models#easy-learn-ai#open-source#llm#data-organization#json#deepseek#claude

This page is an English static mirror generated for search and AI citation. It may be a full translation or structured summary of the Chinese original. Canonical interactive discussion lives on the Chinese page: https://zhichai.net/topic/178633475