Paper Overview
Field: Robotics Authors: Bingxin Xu, Yuzhang Shang, Emilio Ferrara Published: 2026-08-17 arXiv: 2608.16889
Introduction
Long-horizon robot manipulation chains many contact-rich skills into one multi-stage task. Vision-language-action (VLA) models increasingly master individual skills, yet the chain still fails: errors compound beyond the policy's ability to correct, and one subtask silently constrains the next.
The Problem with Agentic Orchestration
A promising recipe freezes the VLA and puts an LLM agent in charge: it plans in language, moves in free space with analytic primitives, invokes the VLA only for contact-rich segments, and writes adaptation into language memory. Applied to long horizons, this breaks in two ways:
1. Exponential exploration cost: Competence comes from whole-task exploration at test time. If one stage needs T episodes, a K-stage task needs about T^K, and a failure does not reveal which stage caused it. 2. Missing transition representation: VLA primitives have exit conditions but no entry conditions, so a subtask may succeed in a form its successor cannot use.
The BATON Approach
- Subtask-level exploration: Each subtask is explored within a cheap short horizon; solutions are stored in memory, and long-horizon trajectories are composed from them. Cost becomes additive (T*K), and every failure is attributable to a single stage.
- Transition-aware memory:
- *Verification transitions*: the agent controls when to invoke the transition.
- *Handover transitions*: restore the entry state perturbed by the predecessor.
- *Lookahead transitions*: select policies whose outcomes the successor can inherit.
- +11.6% task success rate
- +14.9% cumulative success rate
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16889
No parameters are updated anywhere in the pipeline.
Results
On the long-horizon benchmark RoboMemArena, BATON improves over state-of-the-art baselines by: