Overview
Field: NLP Authors: Dewu Zheng, Yanlin Wang, Xiwen Wang, Kefeng Duan, Hongyu Zhang, Xilin Liu, Yuchi Ma, Zibin Zheng arXiv: 2608.27442
Abstract
In real-world software development, code review typically involves iterative interactions between developers and reviewers to improve software quality, making the process costly and time-consuming. Although recent work explores large language models (LLMs) for automated code review, most approaches oversimplify code review into a single-round, static decision task, which fails to capture the multi-round interactive nature and the complex problem-solving processes inherent in realistic review scenarios.
To bridge this gap, the authors introduce MCR-Bench, the first defect state-aware benchmark designed for realistic multi-round code review. MCR-Bench covers five commonly-used programming languages and consists of 2,269 real-world multi-round code review tasks, each annotated with fine-grained defect information and cross-round state labels.
Key Findings
Through extensive experiments with mainstream LLMs, the paper identifies:
1. Limited overall capability: LLM performance degrades significantly as the number of interaction rounds increases. 2. Defect-sensitive performance: LLM performance varies markedly across different defect types and severity levels. 3. Underlying failure mechanisms: Error analysis reveals critical weaknesses such as cross-round temporal misalignment and insufficient long-range memory.
Links
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27442