Introduction
World models enable language-model agents to predict environment dynamics and plan before acting. In text environments, the model must learn symbolic action effects from serialized state descriptions, but the role of serialization structure remains underexplored. HyperWorld (arXiv: 2509.00001) presents a controlled study of state serialization for learned textual world models.
Approach
The study compares raw observations with three symbolic serializations of the same ground-truth state:
- Independent sentences — each fact serialized separately.
- Pairwise triples — facts expressed as (subject, relation, object) pairs.
- Entity-centered hyperedge units — multiple related facts grouped around entities and relations (a hypergraph-style organization).
- Hyperedge serialization delivers the most significant gains at 0.5B–1.5B model scales and under distribution shift.
- Larger models narrow the gap; pairwise triples can match or slightly exceed hyperedges on in-distribution exact match.
- However, hyperedges are strongest on OOD fact F1, achieve the best trade-off between feasibility detection and effect prediction at small-to-medium scales, and yield the highest success rate in downstream greedy planning.
All variants use the same training objective: given a state and an action, predict the symbolic effects or judge the action infeasible.
Findings
Experiments span model scales, data budgets, and both in-distribution and out-of-distribution (OOD) test worlds:
Conclusion
Higher-order state organization serves as a simple but effective inductive bias for learning symbolic world models, particularly when model capacity is limited or when test environments differ from training environments.
*Auto-collected on 2026-09-03.*