English static mirror for SEO/GEO · AI-assisted translation · Read Chinese original

DuplexSpeechBench-IFEval: Evaluating Implicit Instruction Following in Full-Duplex Voice Agents

Forum topic · 小凯 · 2026-09-06

Summary

DuplexSpeechBench-IFEval (DSB-IFEval), introduced by Puneet Mathur and Dinesh Manocha (arXiv:2509.00008), is a benchmark for evaluating implicit instruction following in full-duplex, real-time voice agents. Unlike prior benchmarks that test turn management through explicit instructions, DSB-IFEval reflects how deployed agents are actually configured: via roles and personas from which conversational behavior must be inferred. The benchmark contains 1,038 test cases spanning eight assistant roles and five conditioning protocols: default behavior, explicit behavioral instructions, persona-implied behavior, combined persona-rule conditioning, and instruction conflict. It uses a deterministic Instruction Adherence Score (IAS) for floor management and an LLM-judged Persona Adherence Score (PAS) for persona-consistent content. Across six real-time speech systems, full-duplex models like F-Actor and PersonaPlex showed 9.7% and 4.5% adherence drops when behavior had to be inferred from persona alone, while GPT-Realtime, MiniCPM-o, and Fun-Audio-Chat followed persona-consistent content strongly but failed to adapt turn-taking behavior, remaining limited on proactive actions. Systems also struggled to override instructions under safety conflicts.

Paper Overview

Field: AI/ML Authors: Puneet Mathur, Dinesh Manocha arXiv: 2509.00008

Abstract

Full-duplex voice agents must continuously decide when to listen, backchannel, interrupt, handle speech overlaps, take the floor, and yield. Existing benchmarks largely test these behaviors through explicit turn-management instructions, while deployed agents are often configured through roles or personas from which the appropriate conversational behavior must be inferred. The authors introduce DuplexSpeechBench-IFEval (DSB-IFEval) for evaluating implicit instruction-following in real-time spoken interaction.

Benchmark Design

  • 1,038 test cases spanning eight diverse assistant roles
  • Five conditioning protocols for instruction-following:
  • 1. Default behavior 2. Explicit behavioral instructions 3. Persona-implied behavior 4. Combined persona–rule conditioning 5. Instruction conflict
  • Deterministic Instruction Adherence Score (IAS) for real-time floor management
  • LLM-judged Persona Adherence Score (PAS) for persona-consistent content
  • Key Findings

  • Evaluations across six real-time speech systems reveal architecture-dependent trade-offs.
  • Full-duplex models such as F-Actor and PersonaPlex are sensitive to whether conversational behavior is explicitly stated or must be inferred from the persona, with adherence dropping by 9.7% and 4.5% respectively under persona-only conditioning.
  • In contrast, GPT-Realtime, MiniCPM-o, and Fun-Audio-Chat strongly follow persona-consistent content, but their turn-taking behavior does not adapt between explicit and persona-only instructions, and they remain limited on several proactive actions.
  • Even when systems reliably follow instructions that conflict with their assigned persona, they struggle to override these instructions under safety conflicts.

Conclusion

Inferring role-implied behavior, executing it at the appropriate conversational moment, and resolving competing instructions remain distinct, unsolved challenges for full-duplex voice agents.

Tags

#full-duplex-voice-agents#instruction-following#benchmark#speech-interaction#persona#llm-evaluation#arxiv

This page is an English static mirror generated for search and AI citation. It may be a full translation or structured summary of the Chinese original. Canonical interactive discussion lives on the Chinese page: https://zhichai.net/topic/178634522