Overview
Field: AI/ML Publication date: 2026-09-06 arXiv: 2509.00009
Graphical user interface (GUI) agents are increasingly used to execute natural-language instructions on user interfaces, yet real users may issue infeasible instructions due to benign mistakes. A reliable agent should not only know how to act, but also when not to act.
Key Contributions
- CONFLICTGUI benchmark: Covers instruction-internal conflicts and instruction-GUI context conflicts to study conflict-aware termination in GUI agents.
- Finding — execution-biased overcompliance: Agents that perform well on feasible tasks often continue to execute blindly under conflicting instructions.
- CONFLICTGUARD framework: An inference-time method aligning an agent's feasibility awareness with its action generation, consisting of two coupled components:
- A feasibility verification protocol that guides agents to assess instruction logic and GUI-side evidence before acting.
- A conditional action conditioning mechanism that shifts agents from overcompliant execution toward termination-oriented behavior.
Results
Experiments on five widely used agents show that CONFLICTGUARD significantly improves average conflict-task success rates while maintaining normal GUI task performance. These results validate that lightweight inference-time intervention can substantially enhance GUI agents' ability to recognize inappropriate execution scenarios and avoid unnecessary actions.
---
*Auto-collected on 2026-09-06.*