Overview
- Field: AI/ML
- Authors: Saptarshi Basu, Sandeep Kakar, Ashok Goel
- Published: 2026-09-06
- arXiv: 2509.00005
- AI teaching assistants powered by large language models (LLMs) offer scalable educational support but often provide limited personalization.
- The study introduces a prompt-engineering framework for personalizing general-purpose LLM/RAG-based AI teaching assistants (e.g., Jill Watson) across academic disciplines and courses.
- Responses are adapted along six learner-specific dimensions: self-assessment, abstraction preference, verbosity preference, perceptual orientation, information processing style, and level of understanding — yielding 96 distinct learner profiles.
- Student queries are analyzed using Bloom's Taxonomy to estimate cognitive complexity at the interaction level.
- Learner attributes and cognitive assessments are encoded into structured prompts, conditioning the LLM without retraining the model.
- Evaluation used NLP metrics plus a human study with five participants.
- Results show perceived differences in response style and structure under personalized conditions; statistical analysis identified learner attributes correlated with measurable response variation.
- Findings offer preliminary evidence that prompt-based personalization can enable adaptive behavior in LLM-driven educational agents.
Key points
Abstract (original)
Artificial intelligence (AI) teaching assistants powered by large language models (LLMs) offer scalable educational support but often provide limited personalization. This study presents a prompt-engineering-based framework for personalizing general-purpose LLM/RAG-based AI teaching assistants such as Jill Watson across academic disciplines and courses. The framework adapts responses using six learner-specific dimensions: self-assessment, abstraction preference, verbosity preference, perceptual orientation, information processing style, and level of understanding, yielding 96 distinct learner profiles. Student queries are additionally analyzed using Bloom's Taxonomy to estimate cognitive complexity at the interaction level. Learner attributes and cognitive assessments are encoded in structured prompts...
--- *Auto-collected on 2026-09-06*