Overview
Field: AI/ML Authors: Puneet Mathur, Dinesh Manocha Published: 2026-09-06 arXiv: 2509.00008
Full-duplex voice agents must continuously decide when to listen, backchannel, interrupt, handle speech overlaps, take the floor, and yield. Existing benchmarks largely test these behaviors through explicit turn-management instructions, while deployed agents are often configured through roles or personas from which the appropriate conversational behavior must be inferred. DuplexSpeechBench-IFEval (DSB-IFEval) was introduced to evaluate implicit instruction-following in real-time spoken interaction.
Benchmark Design
- 1,038 test cases spanning eight diverse assistant roles
- Five conditioning protocols for instruction-following: 1. Default behavior 2. Explicit behavioral instructions 3. Persona-implied behavior 4. Combined persona-rule conditioning 5. Instruction conflict
- Metrics:
- Deterministic Instruction Adherence Score (IAS) for real-time floor management
- LLM-judged Persona Adherence Score (PAS) for persona-consistent content
- Full-duplex models such as F-Actor and PersonaPlex are sensitive to whether conversational behavior is explicitly stated versus inferred from a persona, with adherence dropping 9.7% and 4.5% respectively under persona-only conditions.
- GPT-Realtime, MiniCPM-o, and Fun-Audio-Chat strongly follow persona-consistent content, but their turn-taking behavior does not adapt between explicit and persona-only instructions, and they remain restricted on several proactive actions.
- Even when systems reliably follow instructions that conflict with their assigned persona, they struggle to override these instructions under safety conflicts.
Key Findings
Across six real-time speech systems, the authors found architecture-dependent trade-offs:
Conclusion
The results show that inferring role-implied behavior, executing it at appropriate conversational moments, and resolving competing instructions remain distinct challenges for full-duplex voice agents.
Source: arXiv:2509.00008