Paper Overview
Field: CV Authors: Junfeng Xia, Wenhao Ye, Junxiang Zhang, Jiayu Zuo, Mo Wang, Quanying Liu Published: 2026-09-09 arXiv: 2609.10518Introduction
fMRI foundation models increasingly aggregate heterogeneous data across brain states, cohorts, and acquisition settings. However, pretraining domains are typically treated as a flat mixture, and downstream tasks are adapted independently. This paper investigates whether measured learning relations can organize both stages—without modifying the backbone architecture.Method
Pretraining: Priority-Guided Domain Curriculum
- A lightweight Brain-DiT proxy estimates two quantities across ten fMRI domains: difficulty and directed facilitation.
- These estimates yield a priority-guided cumulative domain curriculum.
- This is combined with a high-to-low-noise timestep scheduling and joint consolidation.
- Controlled first- and higher-order transfer experiments across fifteen tasks construct a directed taskonomy.
- Budgeted integer programming (BIP) selects directly supervised source tasks and target-specific transfer routes from this taskonomy.
- The joint priority-domain and high-to-low-timestep curriculum reduces:
- v-NMSE by 6.5%
- PSD-NMSE by 16.3%
- FC-MSE by 10.5%
- (relative to uniform sampling over both dimensions)
- Strong downstream performance is demonstrated across six in- and out-of-domain tasks.
- The taskonomy reveals asymmetric, target-dependent transfer.
- Exploratory sealed-test evaluation shows larger descriptive gains for BIP policies when higher-order route spaces are available, compared to matched random controls.
Adaptation: Directed Taskonomy
Results
Conclusion
The findings support organizing fMRI pretraining and adaptation by measured learning relations, rather than treating domains and tasks as independent flat sets.--- *Source: arXiv:2609.10518*