Paper Overview
Field: Machine Learning Authors: Tenghao Huang, Zhaoxuan Tan, Muhao Chen, Jonathan May, Mengting Wan, Longqi Yang, Pei Zhou, Sihao Chen Published: 2026-09-15 arXiv: 2609.12165
Summary
Meeting continuation requires tracking the agenda, speaker roles, participant intentions, and disagreement across long multi-party discussions. The authors introduce the Meeting Dynamic Forecasting Benchmark (MDFB), constructed from 2,207 real-world meetings and 24,794 future-facing queries. Given a transcript prefix and an active question, a model generates a plausible multi-turn continuation in one call.
Evaluation focuses on two axes:
- Utility — progress toward answering the active question
- Human-likeness — plausible conversational flow and role consistency
- A discriminator ranks the observed continuation above samples drawn from the current actor.
- The discriminator's scores constitute a KL-regularized policy reward.
- The model is retrained on the current policy's negative samples, so the reward landscape co-evolves with the actor.
- 0.66 utility win rate (vs. SFT and SPIN baselines)
- 0.70 human-likeness win rate
Neither axis requires exact reproduction of the observed future.
GLARE Method
The paper further presents GLARE (Generative Learning via Adversarial Reward Estimation), an adaptation of adversarial imitation learning to conditional language generation:
Results
In human evaluations, GLARE achieves:
The authors also show MDFB can serve as a social-reasoning arena for comparing general-purpose models — including closed-source systems — using reference-assisted judging. Together, these results demonstrate the benchmark's usefulness both for task-oriented learning and output-based evaluation of meeting behavior.
---
*Auto-collected on 2026-09-15.*