Paper Overview
- Field: Machine Learning
- Author: Blai Bonet
- Posted: 2026-09-14
- arXiv: 2609.15932
- The fragment BΣ°₁ is not an artifact: it is the exact expressive level of stabilization over a finite vocabulary.
- It supports fixed points of a single polarity and their Boolean combinations, but does not support combinations of fixed points of opposite polarity.
- The correspondence requires no counting logic, no external halting signal, and no non-effective acceptance condition.
- This provides networks satisfying the conditions with a verifiable path from weights to symbolic interpretation.
Summary
Recurrent GNNs iterate message passing to convergence, and their logical characterizations to date rely on multi-set aggregation, graded (counting) logics, and halting or acceptance conditions that cannot be verified from the network's parameters. This paper studies recurrent GNNs with set-based aggregation and identifies sufficient conditions, checkable from the weights, for networks to compile into formulas and formulas into networks.
The main result is an effective, two-directional equivalence between a class of networks and the Boolean closure of reachability and safety properties — the fragment BΣ°₁ of the modal μ-calculus.
Key Findings
Original Abstract (excerpt)
> Recurrent GNNs iterate message passing to convergence, and their logical characterizations to date rely on multi-set aggregation, graded (counting) logics, and halting or acceptance conditions that cannot be verified from the network's parameters. We study recurrent GNNs with set-based aggregation and identify sufficient conditions checkable from the weights for networks to compile into formulas and formulas into networks. The main result is an effective, two-directional equivalence between a class of networks and the Boolean closure of reachability and safety properties, the fragment BΣ°₁ of the modal μ-calculus...
---
*Auto-collected on 2026-09-16.*