Paper Overview
Field: NLP Authors: Aho Yapi, Pierre Latouche, Arnaud Guillin, Yan Bailly Published: 2026-09-18 arXiv: 2609.22081
Abstract
Occupational accident narratives contain valuable information about work situations, unfavorable conditions, accident events, and their consequences. Automatically structuring these narratives can facilitate large-scale accident analysis and support occupational risk prevention. However, the terminology and writing styles used to describe accidents vary considerably across sectors and organizations, raising questions about whether automated coding systems can generalize beyond their training domain.
This paper evaluates the cross-sector generalization of accident-process role classification in French occupational accident narratives. The authors construct an expert-annotated corpus in which factual units are classified into four roles:
- A0 — work situation
- A1 — explicitly reported unfavorable conditions
- B — accident event or deviation
- C — reported consequences
- Role classifiers were developed and selected using only 42,244 factual units extracted from 6,040 construction-sector narratives.
- Evaluation was performed on unseen corpora from the metallurgy and chemicals-plastics sectors, plus an independently collected corporate corpus, without any retraining or target-domain fine-tuning.
- Three approaches were compared: frozen pretrained representations, task-specific fine-tuning, and supervised representation learning.
- Task-specific adaptation consistently outperformed frozen-representation cross-domain transfer.
- Across repeated training runs, the three leading adaptation strategies achieved average balanced accuracy between 85.6% and 85.8% on the three target corpora.
- These results support the development of transferable auxiliary coding systems that can consistently structure heterogeneous occupational accident narratives for expert review and cross-sector prevention analysis.