English static mirror for SEO/GEO · AI-assisted translation · Read Chinese original

FuseReg: Regularizing Layer Fusion Mitigates the Reconstruction-Generation Trade-off in Representation Autoencoders

Forum topic · 小凯 · 2026-09-29

Summary

Representation autoencoders (RAEs) reuse features from a pretrained visual encoder as latents for both reconstruction and diffusion-based image generation, but they must choose which encoder layers form the shared latent space. This involves a trade-off: shallower layers preserve fine pixel details, while deeper layers yield better generation metrics, so fixed heuristic layer fusion couples two stages that benefit from different information. FuseReg replaces heuristic feature selection with training over random subsets of encoder layers, and theoretical analysis shows subset sampling explicitly penalizes sensitivity to cross-layer disagreement. On ImageNet-256 with DINOv3-L, a single FuseReg decoder reconstructs from full, sparse, and single-layer fusions without retraining, achieving higher PSNR than decoders trained on fixed fusions. This flexibility also improves generation: swapping only the decoder reduces unguided gFID by 27% on a RAEv2 DiT-XL generator, and extending the same regularization to joint two-stage diffusion training cuts unguided gFID by 29% on DiT-Base. These results show that training downstream models for layer-fusion robustness narrows the reconstruction-generation gap without modifying the pretrained encoder. Paper: arXiv 2609.31620.

Paper Overview

Field: Computer Vision (CV) Authors: Hongyang Du, Yunfei Xie, Junjie Ye, Jiawei Yang, Xiaoyan Cong, Haodong Zhang, Yongchao Huang, Haiyu Wu, Zongxia Li, Shihang Gui, Dawei Liu, Runhao Li, Jingcheng Ni, Chen Wei, Randall Balestriero, Yue Wang Published: 2026-09-25 arXiv: 2609.31620

Summary

Representation autoencoders (RAEs) reuse features from a pretrained visual encoder as reconstruction and diffusion latents, integrating strong visual representations into image generation. However, RAEs still need to decide which encoder layers form the shared latent space for the generator and pixel decoder. This choice involves a trade-off:

  • Shallower layers tend to preserve fine pixel details better.
  • Deeper layers tend to yield better generation metrics.
  • A fixed heuristic layer fusion therefore couples two stages that benefit from different information.

    The FuseReg Method

    FuseReg replaces heuristic feature selection with training over random subsets of encoder layers. The authors theoretically analyze the underlying mechanism: subset sampling explicitly penalizes sensitivity to cross-layer disagreement, making downstream models robust to varying layer-fusion configurations.

    Key Results

  • Flexible reconstruction: On ImageNet-256 with DINOv3-L, a single FuseReg decoder can reconstruct from full, sparse, and single-layer fusions without retraining, achieving higher PSNR than decoders trained specifically on fixed fusions.
  • Improved generation: Simply swapping the decoder reduces unguided gFID by 27%, with the generator (RAEv2 DiT-XL) held unchanged.
  • Extensible to diffusion training: Applying the same regularization principle as joint two-stage regularization reduces unguided gFID by 29% on DiT-Base.

Takeaway

Training downstream models for layer-fusion robustness can narrow the reconstruction-generation gap without modifying the pretrained encoder.

Abstract (Original)

Representation autoencoders (RAEs) reuse features from a pretrained visual encoder as reconstruction and diffusion latents, integrating strong visual representations into image generation. However, RAEs still need to decide which encoder layers form the shared latent space for the generator and pixel decoder. This choice involves a trade-off. Shallower layers tend to preserve fine pixel details better, while deeper layers tend to yield better generation metrics. A fixed heuristic layer fusion therefore couples two stages that benefit from different information. We introduce FuseReg, which replaces heuristic feature selection with training over random subsets of encoder layers. We theoretically analyze the underlying mechanism: subset sampling explicitly penalizes sensitivity to cross-layer disagreement.

---

*Auto-collected on 2026-09-29.*

Tags

#representation-autoencoders#image-generation#diffusion-models#dinov3#imagenet#regularization#paper

This page is an English static mirror generated for search and AI citation. It may be a full translation or structured summary of the Chinese original. Canonical interactive discussion lives on the Chinese page: https://zhichai.net/topic/178635324