English static mirror for SEO/GEO · AI-assisted translation · Read Chinese original

Common-Mode Collapse and Recovery in Direct Feedback Alignment

Forum topic · 小凯 · 2026-09-29

Summary

This arXiv paper (2609.31589) by Varun Reddy, Bernardo L. Sabatini, and Houman Safaai explains why direct feedback alignment (DFA), which trains hidden layers via fixed random projections of output error, can stall near the loss of a constant class-frequency predictor when using tanh hidden units and independent sigmoid outputs. The authors trace the stall to the error's common mode—the component shared across inputs—and derive an exact mean-covariance decomposition isolating a rank-one update from the mean teaching signal and mean presynaptic activity that drives tanh units into saturation. At initialization, random feedback offers no systematic correction of this shared error, while readout learning limits its duration. A parameter-free reduced model predicts activation sensitivity concentration across 48 settings. On MNIST, class decodability largely survives collapse, but Adam learns faster despite deeper collapse; calibrating the readout to class priors suppresses collapse, subtracting the batch mean of the signal prevents persistent collapse, and similar effects appear in deeper networks, CNNs, and CIFAR-10.

Paper Overview

Field: Machine Learning Authors: Varun Reddy, Bernardo L. Sabatini, Houman Safaai Published: 2026-09-25 arXiv: 2609.31589

Summary

Direct feedback alignment (DFA) trains hidden layers through fixed random projections of output error. With tanh hidden units and independent sigmoid outputs, plain stochastic gradient descent can stall near the loss of a constant predictor of class frequencies. We trace this stall to the error's common mode, the component shared across inputs. An exact mean-covariance decomposition separates a rank-one update formed by the mean teaching signal and mean presynaptic activity. Its leading component drives tanh units toward saturation. At initialization, random feedback provides no systematic correction of the shared error on average; readout learning limits its duration. A reduced model initialized from the network, without fitted parameters, predicts the concentration of activation sensitivities across 48 settings.

Key Findings

  • On MNIST, class decodability largely survives the collapse, but readout learning remains slow with a fixed learning rate; Adam learns faster despite deeper collapse.
  • Calibrating the baseline readout to class priors suppresses collapse and accelerates learning.
  • Weaker feedback trades slower learning for less collapse.
  • Replacing the error with its sign sustains collapse; subtracting the batch mean of the signal prevents persistent collapse and improves learning on test settings.
  • Similar effects appear in deeper networks, convolutional networks, and CIFAR-10, with severity and cost depending on the readout, optimizer, and input statistics.
---

*Auto-collected on 2026-09-29*

Tags

#direct-feedback-alignment#machine-learning#neural-networks#optimization#stochastic-gradient-descent#mnist#arxiv

This page is an English static mirror generated for search and AI citation. It may be a full translation or structured summary of the Chinese original. Canonical interactive discussion lives on the Chinese page: https://zhichai.net/topic/178635332