Paper Overview
Field: NLP Authors: Alexander Gurung, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Mirella Lapata arXiv: 2609.31571
Summary
Many LLM training and inference methods, including RL and test-time scaling, depend on repeated sampling, but they only benefit when responses meaningfully differ. Self-training faces the same challenge: training data is typically constructed by sampling IID responses and filtering primarily for correctness, thereby overrepresenting strategies a model already favours.
This paper investigates strategic diversity—substantive variation among approaches to a problem—as an alternative principle for constructing self-training data. Two sampling methods are proposed:
- GROOT: a new method that constructs a hierarchical tree of approaches and samples distinct paths.
- Verbalized Sampling (VS): adapted to produce an unstructured set of approaches.
- On competitive programming and next-chapter prediction tasks, models trained on strategically diverse data outperform IID-trained counterparts on difficult tasks.
- Strategically diverse data provides a strong initialization for RL and test-time scaling.
- Most strikingly, self-training on strategically diverse but incorrect trajectories from Qwen3-4B outperformed IID distillation from a 235B teacher model.
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31571
Findings
These results challenge popular assumptions about what constitutes useful self-training data, showing that diversity of approaches may matter more than correctness or teacher model size.