Paper Overview
Field: Computer Vision (CV) Authors: Shih-Chen Tseng, Chih-Hsuan Chen, Ryan Yang, Hsi-An Chen, Chun-Wei Tuan Mu, Yu-Lun Liu Published: 2026-10-05 arXiv: 2610.06852Motivation
Pipeline figures in ML papers must be adapted to many canvases: two-column papers, 16:9 slides, portrait posters, 1:1 social media covers, and 9:16 mobile previews. Each format imposes different aspect-ratio constraints on the same computation graph, and any silently broken connector distorts the method itself.Task Definition
The paper defines aspect-ratio-adaptive flowchart relayout: given a raster flowchart and a target aspect ratio, produce a structure-faithful, hallucination-free, *editable* layout.Why Prior Approaches Fail
- Image-to-image models: stretch boxes and refuse extreme aspect ratios.
- Text-to-image agentic systems: hallucinate content.
- Parse-then-render systems: misroute edges.
Proposed Method
An agentic pipeline with three stages:1. Parse 2. Style 3. Layout
Each stage pairs a main agent with a critic. Critics combine deterministic constraint checks with VLM visual feedback, explicitly verifying connectivity to prevent silent breakage of edges. The output is draw.io-editable mxGraph XML.
Results
On a curated benchmark of 100 flowcharts at five aspect ratios, evaluated with Gemini 3.1 Pro and validated against human judgment:| Method | Content Fidelity | |---|---| | This work | 68.6% | | Prior work | 11.2%–41.4% |
Original Abstract
> Pipeline figures in ML papers must be repurposed across many canvases. We formulate aspect-ratio-adaptive flowchart relayout as a distinct task and propose an agentic pipeline with Parse, Style, and Layout stages, each pairing a main agent with a critic. Outputs are draw.io-editable mxGraph XML. On a curated benchmark of 100 flowcharts at five aspect ratios, our method reaches 68.6% Content Fidelity versus 11.2-41.4% for prior work.*Auto-collected on 2026-10-07.*