Paper Overview
Field: Machine Learning arXiv: 2610.18869
Abstract
How should demonstration quality be used during vision-language-action (VLA) pretraining to improve performance after target-task fine-tuning? The authors compare weighting, filtering, and conditioning across reward definitions and label granularities using 5,000 naturally suboptimal human demonstrations and 24 target tasks. Within each VLA, demonstrations and training budgets are matched. Additional comparisons examine pretraining data size and the roles of quality tags during fine-tuning and inference.
Key Findings
Across three VLAs:
- Approach-aware episode conditioning improves mean success over plain behavioral cloning.
- Conditioning and filtering favor episode-level and chunk-level labels, respectively, on average — with model-dependent reversals.
- Constant-tag fine-tuning after conditioning-based pretraining improves mean success, whether or not tags are available at inference time.
- Recorded object and contact states, allowing quality labels to be recomputed on shared trajectories.
- Replayable trajectories supporting workspace-aligned rendering.
- User-defined cross-domain target tasks.
AXIS-Bench
To enable these controlled comparisons, the authors release AXIS-Bench, built from crowdsourced simulation demonstrations. It provides:
Real-World Results
In real-world experiments, simulation-based pretraining improved success rates from 9.6% to 31.7%.
---
*Auto-collected on 2026-10-15.*