Paper Overview
- Field: NLP
- Authors: Dongxu Yang, Hongda Yan, Renxin Wang, Baoli Zhang, Haojia Zuo, Ying Zhao, Youmin Chen, Xiaojian Liao, Congming Gao, Tianyang Jiang, Yixiao Chen, Qing Wang, Zhiguo Yu, Xiaqing Li, Yuhao Zhang, Jiawen Sun, Renzhe Xu, De Mi, Tiancheng Wu, Xianya Fu, Xuanlu Zhao, Bo Feng, Meixuan Ren, Guanming Lin, Ziheng Zhou, Xinhua Wang
- Published: 2026-10-15
- arXiv: 2610.22350
- The best agent configuration reached an average score of only 0.56 in realistic scenarios requiring discovery of unstated constraints.
- Only 14 out of 95 tasks were fully solved.
- Uncovering unstated constraints is the primary bottleneck for agents in real-world delivery.
- The results reveal a significant gap between well-specified task solving and delivering effective AI systems to real customers.
- Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22350
Abstract (translated)
Existing agent benchmarks typically evaluate agents on well-specified tasks defined by issue reports, specifications, or task tickets. Real-world customer delivery is different: forward-deployed engineers (FDEs) must clarify ambiguous requirements, work in live systems, and uncover unstated constraints. FDE-Gym is a benchmark of 95 end-to-end delivery tasks from 20 customer scenarios across 18 sectors, each adapted by industry experts from real-world delivery projects. In simulated customer environments with scripted stakeholders and modifiable customer systems, agents interact with stakeholders and operate on production-like systems to deliver working solutions. FDE-Gym scores a delivery by how much it improves the customer's own success metric, normalized between 0 (unchanged) and full improvement, while penalizing excessive stakeholder interactions.