Paper Overview
Field: ML / Optimization Authors: Athanasios Glentis, Dawei Li, Mingyi Hong arXiv: 2610.37647
Why Weight-Norm Control Matters
Weight decay and explicit weight-norm constraints are known to improve optimizer performance in language model (LLM) pretraining, but a unified understanding of *why* such control helps and *how much* is needed has remained incomplete. This paper provides that analysis for the Muon optimizer family.
Key Contributions
- Accumulated effective learning rate: The authors analyze norm control over the entire training trajectory via
- Diagnosis of vanilla Muon: Vanilla Muon can accumulate only *logarithmically*, which may limit exploration and helps explain its slower empirical progress. In contrast, MuonW and MuonH guarantee at least linear accumulation under the stated conditions.
- Relaxed control is enough: Sufficiently slow norm growth guarantees faster accumulation than the logarithmic worst case, opening the door to less restrictive optimizer designs.
- The weight norm grows at most proportionally to \(\sqrt{t}\) after \(t\) steps.
- MuonGS guarantees \(C_T = \Omega(\sqrt{T})\), with accumulation sustained even in later training.
- For smooth scale-invariant objectives, an \(O(T^{-1/2})\) stationarity guarantee is established.
- 160M- and 400M-parameter dense models
- A MoE model with 135M active / 1B total parameters
where \(\eta_t\) is the nominal learning rate and \(\eta_t/\|W_t\|_F\) is the effective learning rate relative to the weight norm. For bounded update directions, accumulation over any training interval bounds the relative weight displacement.
The MuonGS Optimizer
Based on this insight, MuonGS uses Gram–Schmidt (GS) projection to remove the radial component of each Muon update *without fixing the weight norm*. With bounded update directions and a constant nominal learning rate:
Experimental Results
Pretraining experiments covered:
Source
Original abstract: arXiv:2610.37647
--- *Automatically collected on 2026-10-29*