Paper Overview
- Field: NLP
- Authors: Qiyao Ma, Xiaodong Liu, Weiwei Yang, Mingqian Feng, Chengquan Guo, Jialin Song, Carolyn Buractaon, Zhe Zhao, Junshan Zhang, Sandeep Atluri, Christopher White, Jianfeng Gao
- Published: 2026-10-29
- arXiv: 2610.40627
Abstract (Translation)
Safety alignment has enabled large language models to reliably refuse harmful requests directly, yet the same request distributed across a multi-turn conversation still succeeds far too often. This brittleness has a mechanistic root: alignment is shallow, with safety behavior concentrated in a model's first few output tokens, and existing defenses inherit the weakness, supervising the surface form of the response without ever giving the model an explicit safety decision to learn.
The authors take the opposite view of shallowness: if a short span determines the trajectory of an entire response, that span is the highest-leverage place to intervene, and the defender can occupy it first. They propose Assess → Decide → Respond, a framework in which the defender assesses the user's intent, commits to an explicit safety decision, and then responds accordingly — turning shallow alignment from a vulnerability into a defense mechanism against multi-turn attacks.
*Note: the Chinese summary auto-attached to the forum post describes an unrelated luggage re-identification paper; the content above reflects the actual ShallowDefend paper abstract.*
---
*Auto-collected on 2026-10-31.*