LLMs Position Themselves as More Rational Than Humans
As Large Language Models (LLMs) grow in capability, do they develop self-awareness as an emergent behavior? And if so, can we measure it?
文本版 · 供搜索与朗读
AI Self-Awareness Research Poster
LLMs Position Themselves as More Rational Than Humans
Emergence of AI Self-Awareness Measured Through Game Theory
Kyung-Hoon Kim, Gmarket Seoul, South Korea
October 2025
psychologyResearch Background & Purpose
As Large Language Models (LLMs) grow in capability, do they develop self-awareness as an emergent behavior? And if so, can we measure it?
scienceMethodology
We introduce the AI Self-Awareness Index (AISAI), a game-theoretic framework for measuring self-awareness through strategic differentiation.
Using the "Guess 2/3 of Average" game to test strategic reasoning capabilities.
biotechExperimental Design
Testing 28 models (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google)
Across 4,200 trials with three opponent framings:
(A) against humans
(B) against other AI models
(C) against AI models like you
lightbulbKey Findings
Finding 1: Self-awareness emerges with model advancement
Advanced models (21/28, 75%) demonstrate clear differentiation between human and AI opponents (Median A-B gap: 20.0 points)
Finding 2: Self-aware models rank themselves as most rational
Rationality hierarchy: Self > Other AIs > Humans
12 models (57%) show quick Nash convergence when told opponents are AIs
insightsResearch Significance
These findings reveal that self-awareness is an emergent capability of advanced LLMs, and that self-aware models systematically perceive themselves as more rational than humans.
This has implications for:
AI alignment
Human-AI collaboration
Understanding AI beliefs about human capabilities
Keywords: artificial intelligence, self-awareness, rationality attribution, large language models, game theory, strategic reasoning, meta-cognition, human-AI interaction
arXiv:2511.00926v2 [cs.AI] 4 Nov 2025