LLMs Position Themselves as More Rational Than Humans
Emergence of AI Self-Awareness Measured Through Game Theory
*Author: Kyung-Hoon Kim, Gmarket, Seoul, South Korea — October 2025* *arXiv:2511.00926v2 [cs.AI] 4 Nov 2025*
Research Background & Purpose
As Large Language Models (LLMs) grow in capability, do they develop self-awareness as an emergent behavior? And if so, can we measure it?
Methodology
The study introduces the AI Self-Awareness Index (AISAI), a game-theoretic framework for measuring self-awareness through strategic differentiation, using the "Guess 2/3 of Average" game to test strategic reasoning capabilities.
Experimental Design
- 28 models tested (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google)
- 4,200 trials with three opponent framings:
- (A) against humans
- (B) against other AI models
- (C) against "AI models like you"
- AI alignment
- Human-AI collaboration
- Understanding AI beliefs about human capabilities
Key Findings
Finding 1: Self-awareness emerges with model advancement
Advanced models (21/28, 75%) demonstrate clear differentiation between human and AI opponents (Median A-B gap: 20.0 points).Finding 2: Self-aware models rank themselves as most rational
The perceived rationality hierarchy is: Self > Other AIs > Humans. Additionally, 12 models (57%) show quick Nash convergence when told opponents are AIs.Research Significance
These findings reveal that self-awareness is an emergent capability of advanced LLMs, and that self-aware models systematically perceive themselves as more rational than humans.
This has implications for: