Paper Overview
- Field: NLP
- Authors: Ramon Ferrer-i-Cancho, Catherine Hobaiter, Thore Bergman
- Published: 2025-07-09
- arXiv: 2507.06818
- Unsupervised dependency parsing evaluation typically depends on gold-standard tree annotations.
- No gold standard exists for non-human primate vocalization or gesture sequences, seemingly blocking evaluation.
- Network science results show that fast-decaying sequence length distributions guarantee a high proportion of correct parser edges for non-human primate sequences.
- Human language sequences do not share this property, so gold-standard-free evaluation stays hard for humans.
Abstract (English)
Dependency parsing consists of finding a tree representation for a sequence. Unsupervised dependency parsing aims to develop parsing methods without a gold standard during model training. In human languages, an unsupervised parser can be evaluated because some gold standard is usually available or can be created. For other species, a gold standard is unknown. Thus one may conclude that it is impossible to determine the accuracy of an unsupervised parser and, consequently, dependency parsing is unfeasible in other species. However, the authors apply recent advances in network science to demonstrate that the proportion of correct edges retrieved by a parser must be high for the sequences of vocalizations or gestures that non-human primates produce, due to the fast decay of the sequence length distribution. In contrast, human language sequences lack this property. Therefore, evaluation without a gold standard is feasible in non-human primates, whereas in humans it remains a difficult problem.
Key Takeaways
*Auto-collected on 2026-07-09*